To fully understand the passage in Luke for today, we need to look at the politics of Judea in the First Century. To help, I found an excellent article you can read if you want. You will find it at https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=studiaantiqua
I will give a summary of the key points. The history goes back a century before the time of Jesus. Rome was still a Republic ruled by the Senate. The leader of the Senate then was a man we call Pompey (not to be confused with the city of Pompei). Pompey decided to use the practice of patron-client in his dealings with Judea.
Roman culture was built on the patron-client system. Nearly everyone was both. As a middle-class teacher, I would be the patron of all the young boys (never girls) who wanted to follow me. I would provide an education for them, and they would provide for my needs; keeping house, cooking, etc. I, in turn, would be a client of a few wealthier men, often fathers of the boys, who would make sure I had money to survive and continue teaching. The education was free.
Pompey, in 63 BCE, stepped into a civil war in Judea and placed Hyrcanus in his rightful place as High Priest and Antipater as governor. He became their patron. It was not just in name. He gave them money when they needed it. He loaned troops when there was trouble. Pompey used his influence in Rome to make sure the two men were successful in Judea.
Hyrcanus and Antipater returned all the support they could to their patron. Naturally, they collected taxes and sent a large portion to Pompey, but they also defended him in their region against anyone who opposed Pompey. It was a mutual aid society, with Pompey getting more than Judea got. But, in exchange, Antipater and Hyrcanus ran the country as they wanted, within some limits.
Julius Caesar overthrew Pompey and took control of all his clients. He continued the same policies. Antipater named his son, Phasael, as governor of Galilee, and his son, Herod, as governor of Jerusalem.
When Julius Caesar was murdered in the Senate, civil war broke out. Mark Anthony was able to control Egypt and the eastern portion of the Republic for a few years. Governor Herod threw his full support to Mark Anthony who got the Senate to name Herod King of Judea. He would become known in history as Herod the Great.
However, there was a huge bump in the road to greatness. Octavian defeated Mark Anthony and became the sole ruler of the Republic, later called Augustus. Herod faced death for backing the wrong contender. He packed his bags and went to Octavian to seek forgiveness and give Octavian a pile of gold if he would allow him to continue as king. For his part, Octavian recognized Herod as being tough and able to rule the difficult Jews.
By the time of Jesus, Herod died and left three of his sons in charge. Archelaus received Galilee, and Herod Antipas received Judea. Rome soon removed Phillip. His ten wives gave him twelve or thirteen children, two of whom he executed, along with their mother. The large family thrived on the patron-client system and continued to play important roles in the first century of Christianity. Ten of them are mentioned by name in the New Testament.
When we read in verse 31 that Herod Antipas is out to get Jesus, we need to understand that Herod was under pressure from Rome to maintain stability in Judea. Anyone who might be a threat to Rome had to be eliminated.
In what way were the actions of Jesus a threat to Rome? Healing people? Neither Rome nor Herod had a problem with that. The issue was that hundreds of people flocked around him where ever he went. Crowds of people can quickly become mobs and mobs can become armies. We have seen it happen on TV, so that should not be a shock.
You might be thinking that Pilate did not want to execute Jesus, so Rome was not worried about him. Pilate was there to protect Rome, true, but he was a client who was only slightly better placed than Herod, who also had powerful patrons. They were rivals. Just a couple of years before, Pilate had received a threat of removal from office for his abusive treatment of the Temple, so he had to tread lightly. He decided to let Herod take the blame if it went wrong.
That is the negative side of the patron-client system. If a mistake is made, it is always the client who made it. Pilate had to shift blame, just in case.
Jesus, on the other hand, was acting as a client of God. It did not matter what either Pilate or Herod did; Jesus did what God led him to do.
The lesson for us is: am I a client of Joe, Mary, Sally, or Sam, or am I a client of God? As a follower of Jesus, I cannot worry about what the world does or thinks.
There is another important detail to remember. The client of a patron must always know what the patron wants. Jesus had the Holy Spirit leading him every second of the way to the cross. Jesus never doubted what his next step would be.
I must strive to have that constant relationship with God, that understanding of his will, that will make it possible to follow in Jesus’ footsteps. None of us can do it as well as Jesus did, but the saints do it very well indeed.
Why did Jesus say, it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be killed except in Jerusalem! CJB Prophets had been killed in the city for centuries. This is one of Jesus’ little jokes. I’m a prophet, Herod plans to kill me. I must get to Jerusalem where so many others have been killed. Yes, a dark joke.
Read my earlier comments on this theme here.
Be righteous and do good.